Douglas Wilson, Presbyterian
pastor, argues in this short clip that he doesn’t know for sure what happens to
babies who go to heaven. He argues that
children born to believing parents (“covenant children”) go to heaven because -
for some reason with absolutely no Biblical evidence - God is gracious only to
Bible-believing parents in regards to their children. The most complete distortion of covenant
theology I have ever heard. He then says
that he “doesn’t know” what happens to children of pagan parents who die—he says
there is no indication in Scripture that they go to heaven.
This whole issue of what
happens to babies who die is very near and dear to my own heart. A younger sibling of mine was miscarried when
I was just a few years old. Often, I and
my brothers ask my parents, “What happened to our miscarried sibling?” My parents always answer the same way: “He/she
is in heaven.”
Is my deceased
brother/sister in heaven just because he/she was a “child of the covenant”? Do all babies/mentally handicapped people go
to heaven? Biblically and theologically
the answer is clear: yes. All babies go
to heaven.
The carefully-studied
Reformed believer might immediately get offended at this. They would come at me and say, “Don’t you
believe in the total depravity of man?
Don’t you believe that all humans, including babies, are born sinners
and that all sinners are damned to hell?
Don’t you believe that salvation is by faith alone and that, because
babies and handicapped people are incapable of faith, they must necessarily be
reprobate?” This seems like a logical
and very Reformed argument; and if it were, the Reformed position would be that
all babies went to hell. But there are
immense gaps in this theology, gaps which can be mended this way: God draws all
infants to himself by grace and bestows on them salvation through Christ.
Let me begin by saying
that I completely affirm the natural depravity of man. Romans 5 makes it clear that, through Adam,
sin and death spread to all mankind so that all mankind sins and is guilty
because of their sinful natures from birth.
Thus, even babies who are born are naturally sinful and depraved – they have
inherited a sin nature from Adam’s first sin (God made Adam the representative
for the human race – when he fell into sin, all mankind subsequently fell into
sin). Thus, babies are depraved. Moreover, they commit sins as well. They are not conscious sins, assuredly, but
they certainly give into fits of anger, rudeness, envy, and the like. Shouldn’t, then, they be sent to hell? Certainly – babies deserve damnation. But yet they are saved – saved by grace.
It must be noted that
this “salvation of infants” is only for those under the age of
accountability. That age of
accountability – the time before the intellect is matured and children are able
to intellectually understand sin and salvation – differs for children. Some children do not mature intellectually –
are not able to come to an intellectual faith in Christ – for many years; some
never do, and these we label as the “mentally handicapped” or “mentally retarded”
(these individuals are never able to intellectually come to faith). What, then, happens to individuals who die
before they are able to come to an intellectual faith? Do they go to hell because they have no
faith? No – rather, they are saved by
grace apart from faith.
Like any good Calvinist,
I believe in Sola Fide – salvation by
faith alone. However, I regard Sola Fide different from some – I believe
it to be a corollary, a subpoint, to Sola
Gratia (salvation by God’s grace alone).
This is because men can only come to faith if they are first led to faith by Christ through God’s
grace (see Eph. 2:8-9). Thus, faith
rests upon and relies upon grace. So, it
is grace that is necessary for
salvation – not faith. Faith is only a
gift which God gives to those individuals whom He calls and who have an
intellectual capacity for faith. All the
elect beyond the age of accountability are saved by grace through faith. All those below the age of accountability are
saved by grace without faith. After all,
they can’t have faith – they are
intellectually incapable. Moreover, if
they are intellectually incapable of faith, they are also incapable of making a
conscious rejection of God (Rom. 1:18) or of committing conscious sin. They are still sinful and depraved, but they
are intellectually innocent before God because they have not consciously
rejected Him.
Moreover, Scripture
never teaches that God condemns anyone to hell who has not first committed sins
out of unbelief. Rev. 20, in speaking of
the Final Judgment, says that the reprobate will be condemned for what they had done (v. 12). They are damned by their works – their sins. Thus, all who have ever sinned (including
babies) must be sent to hell, it would seem.
However, the question must be asked: what is the crime of sin? The answer is obvious: unbelief (or, a conscious
rejection and rebellion against of God).
It was this unbelief (rebellion) that even led Adam and Eve to commit the
first sin. Unbelief is always the root of
all damnable works (cf. Rom. 11:20, Heb. 3:19) – it is unbelief (rebellion against
God) that sends one to hell. That is why
only unbelievers are sent to
hell. Infants don’t have unbelief. They are neither believers nor unbelievers. They are intellectually ignorant to matters of
God and sin and thus they cannot “choose”
God or reject Him. Thus, infants and all
those below the age of accountability do not have unbelief and thus their sins
are not conscious or willful. Infants,
though depraved, are intellectually innocent, and God saves these innocent ones
by grace. This fits perfectly with the
idea that God only damns those who have unbelief.
Infants deserve to go to
hell (they are sinful and they sin).
However, God, by grace, draws them to Him, even those who do not have
faith (and also do not have unbelief).
And thus, God can say in Scripture that He will only damn those who have
unbelief (indicating that all those who do not
have unbelief are saved by grace without faith).
This theological truth
(that those below the age of accountability are saved) is also backed up with
specific examples in Scripture. The
classic example is the death of David’s illegitimate child in 2 Sam. 2. When David and Bathsheba’s child falls
grievously sick, this righteous king fasted
and went in and lay all night on the ground (v.16). He could not be persuaded to rise or
eat. He was passionately interceding for
the life of the child. However, as was
God’s will, the child did die. When
David heard the news, he arose from the
earth and washed and anointed himself and changed his clothes. And he went into the house of the LORD and
worshiped. He then went to his own house
(v. 20). Why the sudden change in
attitude (a question his own servants ask him)?
It is because he knew that there was nothing he could do to bring the
child back; moreover, he was at peace and without distress, knowing that the
child was safe in heaven. He says as
much in v. 23: But now he is dead. Why should I fast? Can I bring him back again? I shall go to him, but he will not return to
me. David was a righteous man,
clearly amongst God’s elect. He would go
to heaven when he died (Ps. 17:15). Thus, if David
were to go to him (the child), the
child must already be in heaven, waiting for David to join him. This reality that David’s child was in heaven
is a perfect example of how God saves those who are intellectually incapable of
faith and who do not yet have unbelief.
My favorite example,
however, is Job 3:11-19, which reads:
11“Why did I not die at birth,
come out from the womb and expire?
12 Why did the knees receive me?
Or why the breasts, that I should nurse?
13 For then I would have lain down and been quiet;
I would have slept; then I would have been at rest,
14 with kings and counselors of the earth
who rebuilt ruins for themselves,
15 or with princes who had gold,
who filled their houses with silver.
16 Or why was I not as a hidden stillborn child,
as infants who never see the light?
17 There the wicked cease from troubling,
and there the weary are at rest.
18 There the prisoners are at ease together;
they hear not the voice of the taskmaster.
19 The small and the great are there,
and the slave is free from his master.
come out from the womb and expire?
12 Why did the knees receive me?
Or why the breasts, that I should nurse?
13 For then I would have lain down and been quiet;
I would have slept; then I would have been at rest,
14 with kings and counselors of the earth
who rebuilt ruins for themselves,
15 or with princes who had gold,
who filled their houses with silver.
16 Or why was I not as a hidden stillborn child,
as infants who never see the light?
17 There the wicked cease from troubling,
and there the weary are at rest.
18 There the prisoners are at ease together;
they hear not the voice of the taskmaster.
19 The small and the great are there,
and the slave is free from his master.
Job’s picture of
a deceased stillborn is clear: they are in a place of rest and ease, free from
wickedness. He even says that stillborns
have a greater existence in their death than the living do in their turbulent lives. Yet how could this be if stillborns go to
hell? Hell is a far worse existence than
here on earth. Thus, the only possible
explanation of this passage is that stillborns go to heaven, a place of perfect
rest, ease, and righteousness. They must
be saved before birth by God’s grace. And
if stillborns go to heaven, so must infants who die after birth and the
mentally handicapped who have no intelligence of their own. After all, the identity of all three
categories (stillborn, infant, and mentally retarded) is the same: they are all
incapable of faith and unbelief, they are all depraved (by nature), and yet
they are all intellectually innocent (they have not yet rejected God and
consciously lived according to their sin natures). This example gives further credence to the
idea that all those below the age of accountability go to heaven – they are
saved by grace apart from faith and are gathered by God to Himself.
Thus, it is both
Reformed and Biblical to say that all babies go to heaven. It is a specific example of God’s
graciousness towards humanity. He did
not have to save infants, but He does. This
has nothing to do with whether a child’s parents were Christians or not – God saves
the intellectually innocent by grace, not because of parental faith or the “covenant
family”. This is cause for both hope and
praise. The assembly of the righteous at
the end of time will be largely made up of these infants who have been spared a
life of hardship to spend immediate eternity with God in joy. God has spared these little ones the pain of
this present world, and we who must endure it will one day see them in glory.
No comments:
Post a Comment